Male Waxing San Francisco

Sexism judicial : What

After the prohibition of imprisonment for Loretta Santinello , the murderer of her husband with a disability to take care of and he did not want that so now it quietly on the loose after three days in a psychiatric clinic (the place where they end up a very short period all women murdered in lieu of prison and that, as noted, is reserved only to men), put under house arrest after Simonetta Agostini, of which there had already spoken, and Maryana Kaminska, the murderer of her fiancé, we speak of imprisonment confirmed for Buonavolontà Francis, the 21 year old accused of killing his father in the violent attempt to defend her mother: a case reminiscent of Nicholas Fini, recently sentenced to many years in prison after a long period of preventive detention. And it's the same fate that will touch the young Buonavolontà, not being a woman. But we talk about what happened.

According to the reconstruction of the police, on 1 November, the murder victim, Mauro Buonavolontà, returns home drunk, as often happened. Shortly after returning, he began an argument with his wife in the presence of the last child of only 15 months. On the upper floor of the house, the two other sons, 21 year old and a 17 year old, they heard the screams, Francis took to the kitchen and tried to separate the parents. And it was then that Francis grabbed a knife and struck his father, killing him. It was not the first time that happened such cases: Mauro Buonavolontà had already been sued several times for ill family members. According to the findings by the police, the victim had alcohol problems and drug was also guilty of crimes against property and was recently released from prison.

On November 6, interrogation and the decision of the investigating judge: Francesco must remain in prison. Has already begun to release the first items justice- of all convictions who points out that the boy is still a murderess and that has to pay. Sentences which strangely never leave when the culprit is a woman then you discover all guaranteed, he tries to justify the gesture and highlight the human drama, it is noted that there is no need for punishment because she has already paid with the His suffering, you want it was the murder of his son (and then it comes on time of depression, abandonment of family, etc..), that of the husband (who in almost all cases is described by media, in a totally rulings as a violent) or someone else. It calls for freedom for the woman who must care for children, and that is promptly granted by the court. Why do the media never speak of this difference in treatment? Because everything has to be relegated to a tiny blog maintained by an individual? One wonders if behind all this there are strong powers, pressure from lobby post-sessantottino and feminists, who want to hide this reality and pass the subliminal message that justice is equal for all.